## 15. References

- [S24] Bingbing Wen, Jihan Yao, Shangbin Feng, et al. Know Your Limits: A Survey of Abstention in Large Language Models. arXiv:2407.18418, 2024.
- [S30] U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. EDGAR Full-Text Search and Archives. https://efts.sec.gov/LATEST/search-index and https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/.
- [S40] Matt Gardner, Yoav Artzi, Victoria Basmova, et al. Evaluating Models' Local Decision Boundaries via Contrast Sets. arXiv:2004.02709, 2020.
- [S47] James A. Hanley, Abby Lippman-Hand. If Nothing Goes Wrong, Is Everything All Right? Interpreting Zero Numerators. JAMA 249(13), 1983. doi:10.1001/jama.1983.03330370053031.
- [S49] Raymond Reiter. On Closed World Data Bases. In Hervé Gallaire and Jack Minker (eds.), Logic and Data Bases, Plenum Press, 1978, pp. 55 to 76. doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-3384-5_3.
- [S53] Yuta Koreeda, Christopher D. Manning. ContractNLI: A Dataset for Document-level Natural Language Inference for Contracts. Findings of EMNLP 2021. arXiv:2110.01799.
- [S57] Curtis G. Northcutt, Anish Athalye, Jonas Mueller. Pervasive Label Errors in Test Sets Destabilize Machine Learning Benchmarks. NeurIPS 2021 Datasets and Benchmarks Track. arXiv:2103.14749.
- [S58] Lianmin Zheng, Wei-Lin Chiang, Ying Sheng, et al. Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena. NeurIPS 2023 Datasets and Benchmarks Track. arXiv:2306.05685.
- [S61] James Thorne, Andreas Vlachos, Christos Christodoulopoulos, Arpit Mittal. FEVER: a Large-scale Dataset for Fact Extraction and VERification. NAACL 2018. arXiv:1803.05355.
- [S62] Zhilin Yang, Peng Qi, Saizheng Zhang, et al. HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answering. EMNLP 2018. arXiv:1809.09600.
- [S63] Qing Lyu, Shreya Havaldar, Adam Stein, et al. Faithful Chain-of-Thought Reasoning. IJCNLP-AACL 2023. arXiv:2301.13379.
- [S64] Liangming Pan, Alon Albalak, Xinyi Wang, William Yang Wang. Logic-LM: Empowering Large Language Models with Symbolic Solvers for Faithful Logical Reasoning. Findings of EMNLP 2023. arXiv:2305.12295.
- [S65] Louis Kaplow. Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis. Duke Law Journal 42(3), 1992, pp. 557 to 629. doi:10.2307/1372840.
- [S66] Phan Minh Dung. On the Acceptability of Arguments and Its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming and n-Person Games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), 1995, pp. 321 to 357. doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-X.
- [S67] Mrinank Sharma, Meg Tong, Tomasz Korbak, et al. Towards Understanding Sycophancy in Language Models. arXiv:2310.13548, 2023.
- [S68] David Madras, Toniann Pitassi, Richard Zemel. Predict Responsibly: Improving Fairness and Accuracy by Learning to Defer. NeurIPS 2018. arXiv:1711.06664.
- [S69] Hussein Mozannar, David Sontag. Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an Expert. ICML 2020. arXiv:2006.01862.
- [S70] Yonatan Geifman, Ran El-Yaniv. Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networks. NeurIPS 2017. arXiv:1705.08500.
- [S71] Gagan Bansal, Tongshuang Wu, Joyce Zhou, et al. Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance. CHI 2021. arXiv:2006.14779.
- [S72] Zana Buçinca, Maja Barbara Malaya, Krzysztof Z. Gajos. To Trust or to Think: Cognitive Forcing Functions Can Reduce Overreliance on AI in AI-assisted Decision-making. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5 (CSCW1), 2021. arXiv:2102.09692.
- [S73] Geoffrey Irving, Paul Christiano, Dario Amodei. AI safety via debate. arXiv:1805.00899, 2018.
- [S74] Yilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Igor Mordatch. Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate. ICML 2024. arXiv:2305.14325.
- [S75] Nelson F. Liu, Kevin Lin, John Hewitt, et al. Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contexts. Transactions of the ACL 12, 2024. arXiv:2307.03172.
- [S76] C. K. Chow. On Optimum Recognition Error and Reject Tradeoff. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 16(1), 1970, pp. 41 to 46. doi:10.1109/TIT.1970.1054406.
- [S77] Raja Parasuraman, Dietrich H. Manzey. Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration. Human Factors 52(3), 2010, pp. 381 to 410. doi:10.1177/0018720810376055.
